Maintained for Historical Purposes

This resource is being maintained for historical purposes only and is not currently applicable.

(DLB - 97 - 11) LOAN ORIGINATION TRANSITION INFORMATION

Bulletin ID
DLB - 97 - 11
PublicationDate: 3/1/97
BulletinID: DLB - 97 - 11


DLB-97-11

March 1997



LOAN ORIGINATION TRANSITION INFORMATION


Dear Colleague:

During the recent Direct Loan Origination Center (LOC) transition,
many Option 2 schools drew down Direct Loan funds to be disbursed
upon receipt of promissory note acknowledgments from the new
LOC in Montgomery. The first PUT to schools from the new LOC
was transmitted on March 10, 1997, instead of March 4, 1997, as
originally planned.

Although a signed promissory note must be received by your
institution prior to the disbursement of any Direct Loan funds to
borrowers, the Department does not require a school to receive
promissory note acknowledgments prior to disbursing Direct Loan
funds. For promissory note review/acceptance guidelines, please
refer to Direct Loan Bulletin DLB-96-6. If a promissory note is not
received or is rejected by the LOC, schools are still responsible for
making sure an acceptable promissory note exists for all loans and
any follow-up necessary for rejected promissory notes still rests with
the institution.

Many schools, in order to avoid the need for follow-up to borrowers
as discussed above, or to protect themselves from potential liability,
have developed internal systems that require a promissory note
acknowledgment to be received prior to making a Direct Loan
disbursement. Some of these schools, in anticipation of receiving
the promissory note acknowledgments from the new LOC, did not
return the excess cash that resulted from the delay in disbursement
caused by the late promissory note acknowledgments. Since the
delay was beyond the control of schools, we will not assess any
liabilities for the failure of a school to return excess cash if the cause
of that failure was related to this problem. This enforcement
limitation will only apply to Direct Loan funds drawn down from
February 28, 1997 through March 7, 1997. In addition, the school
must be able to demonstrate that once it received the promissory note
acknowledgment(s), it immediately made the disbursement(s) to the
borrower(s). Schools are reminded that they remain responsible for
returning any excess cash received for reasons other than this delay
in processing promissory note acknowledgments.

Please feel free to keep this letter as documentation to provide to
auditors and others who may be reviewing your institution's
management of the Direct Loan Program.

We regret any inconvenience this problem may have caused your
institution. Thank you for your continued support of the Direct Loan
Program.

Sincerely,


Joe L. McCormick
Chair, Direct Loan Task Force